Burlington is doing it, as are many other Ontario communities. Should Hamilton make an on-line voting option available for the upcoming election? Does on-line voting make sense given dwindling turnout? What about security concerns?
« Revisiting the one-bag limit | Main | Differing views on economic development »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c28e853ef0133f48f6c88970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference On-line voting in Hamilton?:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
As a property owner and taxpayer, I question who or what machine is used to sent out voter and pole information cards, as both my partner and I who are listed on the tax payers rolls, did not receive cards. Yet we did for the federal election.??? Result we did not know where the voting station was located!!
Posted by: R M PASTORIUS & J D GODIN | November 04, 2010 at 07:24 PM
Hacker infiltration ends D.C. online voting trial
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/debonis/2010/10/hacker_infiltration_ends_dc_on.html
Experts raise warning flags over D.C. Internet voting plan
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/debonis/2010/09/experts_raise_warning_flags_ov.html
Posted by: Stench | October 04, 2010 at 11:16 PM
I'm not as concerned about hacking as good old fashioned coercion. With the secret ballot, nobody, including your spouse/children/parents knows how you *really* voted. With online voting, they can stand over your shoulder as you vote or even worse take your 'code' and vote on your behalf. This is a real concern in the case of elderly parents or abusive relationships in general. Plus, now you really can sell your vote! For these reasons I am against online voting.
Posted by: shamrocked | October 02, 2010 at 02:40 PM
The McMaster Students Union is testing out Online Voting for the first time this year to address low voter turnout and the amount of resources needed for paper balloting. Seems to be a trend moving across campuses - could be cool for cities/provinces/Canada as well!
Posted by: John McIntyre | September 28, 2010 at 04:53 PM
IMHO if people can't find the time to visit a polling booth, their true desire to inform themselves and vote can't be taken to seriously.
Posted by: Hopeful | September 28, 2010 at 10:20 AM
I would agree to that as long as there is an independent audit of the results to be sure hackers don't manipulate the votes.Far more convienent....
Posted by: TheRandomFactor | September 28, 2010 at 09:05 AM
Its about time for crapsake, what a waste of millions of dollars to stand in line and put a piece of paper in a box, lol. Like we're a 3rd world country for god sake. Problems arise with boxes of paper to, we've seen it before. The net is here and billions of commerce happen through it. Banks, utilities and just about everyone else is taking advantage, why not voting. Where are the opinions of tree huggers that want to save garbage and paper. Political parties driving elderly to polling stations should be outlawed, illegal influencing or what. Let them vote at home so they're not pushed one way or the other.
Posted by: ed | September 27, 2010 at 10:12 AM
Sign of the time's i think.
Posted by: Steve Sheen | September 27, 2010 at 01:16 AM
If we assume that people are lazy and disinterested in voting as it takes time to go to a polling station, why not vote from the convenience of your home? I would respectfully submit that that turnout could be higher. What is more important is that it would improve the democratization of City Hall and the accountability of the councillors. Taken a step further, if every expenditure of at least a million dollars was put to a vote, it is more apt to get public endorsement rather than our wrath at election time.
Posted by: Peter Swire, CMA | September 26, 2010 at 04:52 PM
Bad Idea.Impractical,prone to misuse,just all round wrong thinking.
Posted by: ernest | September 25, 2010 at 11:48 PM
great idea...
we could could then vote for other things like where to put the stadium etc.
let the councilors know where we want our money to be spent instead of wasting thousands on consultants who know nothing about hamilton
Posted by: kevv | September 25, 2010 at 09:30 AM
Bad idea! Read http://www.bradblog.com/?p=6898
"If hackers from foreign countries can penetrate the Pentagon and military computer networks with strategically-timed attacks, what would prevent them (or home-grown hackers) from destroying or changing the votes of Americans casting ballots over the Internet --- potentially impacting results of American elections?"
Posted by: Stench | September 25, 2010 at 07:51 AM